When comparing AI-generated images, one important factor to consider is the aspect ratio. DALL-E and its competitor, Midjourney, differ in their ability to control the aspect ratio of the generated images. Unlike Midjourney, which allows users to specify the desired aspect ratio, DALL-E lacks this feature. This can be challenging when specific size requirements are needed for various applications, such as web layouts, print media, or social media platforms. Midjourney’s ability to tailor the aspect ratio makes it more versatile, providing users with control over the output. In contrast, DALL-E’s limitation may require additional steps for users, like cropping or resizing the images externally.
Both DALL-E and Midjourney demonstrate varying proficiency in text generation, especially when comparing common phrases to more specialized ones. While both perform well in generating widely recognized phrases, less common phrases may yield less reliable results. Additionally, Midjourney often struggles with accurately positioning text within images, while DALL-E generally integrates text seamlessly into the visual narrative. However, both are still in need of improvement before being used in production.
In conclusion, the flexibility of controlling aspect ratio and the proficiency in text generation and positioning are crucial factors when comparing AI-generated images. With continued advancements in AI technology, the understanding of the relationship between textual and visual elements will improve, leading to more accurate and versatile AI-generated images.